SPONSORED CONTENT
Why operational leverage, not just broker growth, is key to profitability in 2026
In today’s hyper-competitive commercial real estate market, brokerages are pushing to do more: more listings, more brokers, more deals. The assumption is simple that more volume equals more profit. But for many firms, growth brings a surprising, sometimes and painful, side effect: rising complexity and shrinking margins. Here at Buildout, we have the privilege of working with brokerages of all shapes and sizes, from coast to coast. And what we have seen is the rise of the growth paradox. And we want you to know that if your firm is experiencing it, you’re not alone.
Growth Isn’t Always Profitable, Here’s Why
When brokerages scale by adding people—without rethinking how work can be done—operations often get bogged down in inefficiencies. Admin teams struggle to keep up with deal flow. Errors creep into commission tracking. Listing materials take longer to produce. And brokers spend more time waiting on internal processes than working with clients.
One principal recently shared with our team, “It doesn’t feel like we’re winning.” Despite doubling the size of their broker team, they saw rising back-office burnout, missed invoices, and no real clarity into deal status. It’s a common refrain: growth shouldn’t feel like backpedaling but it often does when systems and workflows aren’t built to scale.
Reframing the Goal: Scale GCI, Not Just Headcount
What if you could support five, ten, or even fifteen new brokers, without adding a single admin?
Forward-thinking firms are doing exactly that by focusing on operational leverage: structuring their internal teams and processes to handle more work, more accurately, without adding overhead. The result? More Gross Commission Income (GCI) per broker, per coordinator, per dollar of spend.
Here are three strategies brokerages are using right now to unlock scalable, sustainable growth:
1. Specialize Roles to Accelerate Deal Velocity
When everyone does a bit of everything, nothing gets done efficiently. By assigning clear ownership—sales coordinators manage deal movement, marketing coordinators manage listing prep—firms cut delays and reduce handoffs. That kind of role clarity allows deals to move faster, helping brokers close more in less time.
Why it matters: More closed deals = more GCI hitting the books, faster.
2. Standardize Workflows to Increase Output per Broker
Every deal should follow a clear, repeatable path: stages, deadlines, documentation, approvals. Standardization reduces guesswork, improves accuracy, and frees brokers from constantly reinventing the wheel.
Why it matters: Firms with streamlined workflows report higher deal volume per producer—with fewer mistakes.
3. Automate Low-Value Work to Boost Margin
Automation isn’t about replacing people. It’s about eliminating repetitive, judgment-free tasks like data entry, file routing, or status updates. By automating these steps, firms free up admins to focus on high-impact work—and enable a leaner team to support a growing book of business.
Why it matters: Each additional dollar of GCI comes without the cost of another support hire.
You might be thinking, what does this look like in practice? Brokerages applying these principles are transforming their operating models. Some have moved from a 1:7 admin-to-broker ratio to 1:12 or better. That means they have more than doubled their support capacity without doubling staff or overhead.
The financial result? Margin expansion. Every broker becomes more productive. Every coordinator supports more revenue. GCI goes up, but costs stay flat.
Laying the Foundation: Making Automation Work
There’s a catch. Automation and workflow improvements only deliver full value if your systems are unified. Siloed spreadsheets, disconnected CRMs, and manually updated docs create friction and kill scale.
To truly scale, brokerages need a single source of truth (for deals, listings, and contacts), workflow triggers (tied to deal stages and task completion), and real-time visibility (into commissions, approvals, and financials).
Without that foundation, automation breaks down—and operational complexity creeps back in. What we have seen amongst our customers is a series of habits that the high-performing firms all share. In working with a range of CRE brokerages across the country, here’s our observations:
● They map out their full deal lifecycle then align people, process, and tech to support each stage.
● They eliminate redundant tools, consolidating platforms wherever possible.
● They track operational ROI, not just revenue but monitoring admin-to-broker ratios, turnaround times, and deal cycle velocity.
They treat operations not as overhead—but as a strategic asset.
Five Takeaway Questions Every Brokerage Should Ask
If you’re leading or supporting a growing CRE team, here are five critical questions to evaluate whether your firm is built to scale:
- Can we add brokers without increasing admin headcount?
- Where are we still relying on manual, error-prone workflows?
- How long does it take us to get from listing signed to marketing launched?
- Do we have real-time visibility into our deal pipeline and financials?
- Are we structured for scale—or surviving on muscle memory?
As we head into 2026, operational efficiency will separate the most profitable firms from the busiest ones. The most successful brokerages won’t just add more brokers, they’ll build smarter, leaner systems to support them.
Efficiency and profitability aren’t trade-offs. With the right approach, they become the same thing.